Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 4800: Comparative Performance Analysis of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Technologies

Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 4800: Comparative Performance Analysis of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) Technologies

Energies doi: 10.3390/en18184800

Authors:
Letizia Cretarola
Federico Viganò

This study presents a comprehensive performance assessment of combustion-based options for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), widely regarded as key enablers of future climate neutrality. From 972 publications (2000–2025), 16 sources are identified as providing complete data. Seven technologies are considered: Calcium Looping (CaL), Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC), Hot Potassium Carbonate (HPC), low-temperature solvents (mainly amine-based), molten sorbents, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFCs), and oxyfuel. First- and second-law efficiencies are reported for 53 bioenergy configurations (19 reference plants without carbon capture and 34 BECCS systems). Performance is primarily evaluated via the reduction in second-law (exergy) efficiency and the Specific Primary Energy Consumption per CO2 Avoided (SPECCA), both relative to each configuration’s reference plant. MCFC-based systems perform best, followed by CLC; molten sorbents and oxyfuel also show very good performance, although each is documented by a single source. Low-temperature solvents span a wide performance range—from poor to competitive—highlighting the heterogeneity of this category; HPC performs in line with the average of low-temperature solvents. CaL exhibits modest efficiency penalties alongside appreciable energy costs of CO2 capture, a counterintuitive outcome driven by the high performance of the benchmark plants considered in the definition of SPECCA. To account for BECCS-specific features (multiple outputs and peculiar fuels), a dedicated evaluation framework with a revised SPECCA formulation is introduced.