Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 6448: Contributions of Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) to Electrified Miles, Emissions and Transportation Cost Reduction

Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 6448: Contributions of Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) to Electrified Miles, Emissions and Transportation Cost Reduction

Energies doi: 10.3390/en18246448

Authors:
Hritik Vivek Patil
Akhilesh Arunkumar Kumbhar
Erick C. Jones Jr.

Transportation is the highest emitting sector in the US, and electrifying transportation is an effective way to reduce emissions. However, electrification efforts have typically focused on battery electric vehicles (BEVs); but extended-range EVs (EREVs), EVs with a backup gasoline generator, could play a major role. Nonetheless, reducing transportation-related costs and carbon emissions hinges on understanding how an EREV’s range and charging profile affect electric miles driven and, by extension, emission savings. This study evaluates the distribution of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) between electric and gasoline modes for EREVs across electric range (25–150 miles) and charging frequency scenarios. Using 2023 U.S. trip data by distance and monthly VMT benchmarks, we apply a dynamic mean-distance estimation method to match observed totals and allocate VMT to EV or gasoline power based on trip length. We explore different charging, efficiency, and cost scenarios. Our results show, at current average efficiencies, that EREVs with a 50-mile range (13.7 kWh battery) could electrify 73.3% of national VMT, while 150-mile range EVs could electrify 86.8% illustrating that there are diminishing returns at higher ranges. We also compute corresponding carbon emissions savings using national fuel economy and emissions factors. Results highlight the nonlinear trade-offs between range and emissions reduction. Findings suggest that expanding the EREV range significantly boosts electrification potential up to 100 miles but offers marginal gains beyond. However, if users charge infrequently, larger range EVs are needed to maintain the benefits of vehicle electrification. Our results imply that policymakers and manufacturers should prioritize moderate range EREVs for households who frequently charge (e.g., homeowners) and long range BEVs for infrequent users (e.g., apartment dwellers).