Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 5307: New Evaluation System for Extra-Heavy Oil Viscosity Reducer Effectiveness: From 1D Static Viscosity Reduction to 3D SAGD Chemical–Thermal Synergy

Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 5307: New Evaluation System for Extra-Heavy Oil Viscosity Reducer Effectiveness: From 1D Static Viscosity Reduction to 3D SAGD Chemical–Thermal Synergy

Energies doi: 10.3390/en18195307

Authors:
Hongbo Li
Enhui Pei
Chao Xu
Jing Yang

To overcome the production bottleneck induced by the high viscosity of extra-heavy oil and resolve the issues of limited efficiency in traditional thermal oil recovery methods (including cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), steam flooding, and steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)) as well as the fragmentation of existing viscosity reducer evaluation systems, this study establishes a multi-dimensional evaluation system for the effectiveness of viscosity reducers, with stage-averaged remaining oil saturation as the core benchmarks. A “1D static → 2D dynamic → 3D synergistic” progressive sequential experimental design was adopted. In the 1D static experiments, multi-gradient concentration tests were conducted to analyze the variation law of the viscosity reduction rate of viscosity reducers, thereby screening out the optimal adapted concentration for subsequent experiments. For the 2D dynamic experiments, sand-packed tubes were used as the experimental carrier to compare the oil recovery efficiencies of ultimate steam flooding, viscosity reducer flooding with different concentrations, and the composite process of “steam flooding → viscosity reducer flooding → secondary steam flooding”, which clarified the functional value of viscosity reducers in dynamic displacement. In the 3D synergistic experiments, slab cores were employed to simulate the SAGD development process after multiple rounds of cyclic steam stimulation, aiming to explore the regulatory effect of viscosity reducers on residual oil distribution and oil recovery factor. This novel evaluation system clearly elaborates the synergistic mechanism of viscosity reducers, i.e., “chemical empowerment (emulsification and viscosity reduction, wettability alteration) + thermal amplification (steam carrying and displacement, steam chamber expansion)”. It fills the gap in the existing evaluation chain, which previously lacked a connection from static performance to dynamic displacement and further to multi-process synergistic adaptation. Moreover, it provides quantifiable and implementable evaluation criteria for steam–chemical composite flooding of extra-heavy oil, effectively releasing the efficiency-enhancing potential of viscosity reducers. This study holds critical supporting significance for promoting the efficient and economical development of extra-heavy oil resources.