Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 5841: Multi-Stage Adaptive Robust Scheduling Framework for Nonlinear Solar-Integrated Transportation Networks

Energies, Vol. 18, Pages 5841: Multi-Stage Adaptive Robust Scheduling Framework for Nonlinear Solar-Integrated Transportation Networks

Energies doi: 10.3390/en18215841

Authors:
Puyu He
Jie Jiao
Yuhong Zhang
Yangming Xiao
Zhuhan Long
Hanjing Liu
Zhongfu Tan
Linze Yang

The operation of modern power networks is increasingly exposed to overlapping climate extremes and volatile system conditions, making it essential to adopt scheduling approaches that are resilient as well as economical. In this study, a two-stage stochastic formulation is advanced, where indicators of system adaptability are embedded directly into the optimization process. The objective integrates standard operating expenses—generation, reserve allocation, imports, responsive demand, and fuel resources—with a Conditional Value-at-Risk component that reflects exposure to rare but damaging contingencies, such as extreme heat, severe cold, drought-related hydro scarcity, solar output suppression from wildfire smoke, and supply chain interruptions. Key adaptability dimensions, including storage cycling depth, activation speed of demand response, and resource ramping behavior, are modeled through nonlinear operational constraints. A stylized test system of 30 interconnected areas with a 46 GW demand peak is employed, with more than 2000 climate-informed scenarios compressed to 240 using distribution-preserving reduction techniques. The results indicate that incorporating risk-sensitive policies reduces expected unserved demand by more than 80% during compound disruptions, while the increase in cost remains within 12–15% of baseline planning. Pronounced spatiotemporal differences emerge: evening reserve margins fall below 6% without adaptability provisions, yet risk-adjusted scheduling sustains 10–12% margins. Transmission utilization curves further show that CVaR-based dispatch prevents extreme flows, though modest renewable curtailment arises in outer zones. Moreover, adaptability provisions promote shallower storage cycles, maintain an emergency reserve of 2–3 GWh, and accelerate the mobilization of demand-side response by over 25 min in high-stress cases. These findings confirm that combining stochastic uncertainty modeling with explicit adaptability metrics yields measurable gains in reliability, providing a structured direction for resilient system design under escalating multi-hazard risks.