Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 17: Control Techniques and Design of Load-Side Controls for the Mitigation of Late-Time High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse

Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 17: Control Techniques and Design of Load-Side Controls for the Mitigation of Late-Time High-Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse

Energies doi: 10.3390/en19010017

Authors:
Connor A. Lehman
Rush D. Robinett
Wayne W. Weaver
David G. Wilson

This paper introduces a novel control archetype designed to mitigate high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) E3 disturbances on the power grid, as well as information on performance and specifications of different control laws for the controller archetype. This method of protection has been overlooked in the literature until now. A controlled voltage supply is placed on the load-side of a transformer, diverting unwanted power from the transformer core to prevent saturation. The controlled voltage source is modeled using four control laws: an integral controller (capacitor), Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an energy storage minimized feedforward control law, and a Hamiltonian feedback law. Results show that the Hamiltonian feedback law and the energy storage minimization feedforward control law both flat-line magnetic flux with similar actuator requirements. The LQR approach requires less energy storage than the other two laws, depending on control tuning, as it allows greater exogenous current flow through the neutral path to ground. This leads to further optimization opportunities based on acceptable exogenous current levels. A sweep of different LQR gains revealed a reduction of approximately 32% in minimum control effort, 47% in minimum power to maintain saturation bounds, 20% in energy storage requirements, and 59% in required controller bandwidth. Voltage and bandwidth requirements of the load-side controller are comparable to neutral blocking requirements with energy and power requirements being higher for the load-side controller. This, however, comes with the benefit of being able to use pre-existing assets—neutral blocking devices have not been deployed. Additionally, the load-side blocking capacitor degrades transformer performance compared to the unmitigated system.

More From Author

Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 22: Decarbonization Pathways in Underground Mining in Cold and Arctic Climates: A Review of Heat Recovery Systems with Case Studies in Canada

Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 21: Integrating Machine Learning Temporal Disaggregation and Physics-Based Simulation for Lifecycle Assessment of Buildings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *