Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 433: The Biddings of Energy Storage in Multi-Microgrid Market Based on Stackelberg Game Theory

Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 433: The Biddings of Energy Storage in Multi-Microgrid Market Based on Stackelberg Game Theory

Energies doi: 10.3390/en19020433

Authors:
Zifen Han
He Sheng
Yufan Liu
Shaofeng Liu
Shangxing Wang
Ke Wang

Dual Carbon Goals are driving transformation in China’s power system, where increased renewable energy penetration is accompanied by heightened fluctuations on the generation and load sides. Energy storage and microgrid coordination have emerged as key solutions. However, existing research faces the challenge of balancing microgrid operations, energy storage services, and the alignment of user demand with stakeholder interests. This paper establishes a tripartite collaborative optimization framework to balance multi-stakeholder interests and enhance system efficiency, assuming fixed energy storage capacity. Centering on a principal-agent game between microgrid operators and consumer aggregators, energy storage service providers are integrated into this dynamic. Microgrid operators set 24-h electricity and heat pricing while adhering to tariff constraints, prompting consumer aggregators to adjust energy consumption and storage strategies accordingly. The KKT conditional method is employed to solve the model, deriving optimal user energy consumption strategies at the lower level while solving marginal pricing equilibrium relationships at the upper level, balancing accuracy with information privacy. The creative contribution of this article lies in the first construction of a tripartite collaborative optimization architecture in which energy storage service providers are embedded in a game of ownership and subordination. It proposes a dynamic coupling mechanism between pricing power, energy consumption decision-making, and energy storage configuration under fixed energy storage capacity constraints, achieving a balance of interests among multiple parties. By building a case study using MATLAB (R2022b), we compare operation costs, benefits, and absorption rates across different scenarios to validate the framework’s effectiveness and provide a reference for engineering applications.

More From Author

Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 432: Design Considerations of Bidirectional Half-Bridge Push–Pull Partial Power Processing Converters for Battery Energy Storage Systems

Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 431: Design Optimization and Control System of a Cascaded DAB–Buck Auxiliaries Power Module for EV Powertrains

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *