Energies, Vol. 19, Pages 1531: Study on the DC Discharge Model of Insulators Polluted by Typical Components Based on Effective Salt Deposit Density
Energies doi: 10.3390/en19061531
Authors:
Wei Zhang
Shaoming Pan
Laisheng Zhong
Liangyuan Chen
Yuan Ma
Pollution flashover accidents of transmission line insulators have a wide impact and low reclosing success rates, posing a serious threat to the safe and stable operation of the power grid. The existing pollution discharge and flashover models of insulator based on equivalent salt deposit density (ESDD) present significant differences from the actual situation. To address this issue, the conductivity of electrolyte solutions experiments is carried out in this paper, and the quantitative functional relationship between conductivity and concentration of typical components is obtained. On this basis, the concept of effective salt deposit density (SDDe) is introduced to characterize the actual mass of pollution participating in surface conduction per unit area. A DC discharge dynamic model for polluted insulators is established and verified based on SDDe combined with the discharge development process. Research results indicate that the average difference between the calculated flashover voltage and experimental value is less than 7%. The deviation of flashover voltage between the SDDe basis model and measured salt deposit density (SDDm) basis value increases with the increasing proportion of slightly soluble components. With the increase of insulator surface water adhesion, the flashover voltage obtained by the proposed model decreases while the corresponding SDDm basis value remains constant. The effects of factors such as slightly soluble pollution and surface water adhesion are considered in the proposed model sufficiently. The application of the model based on SDDe can improve the accuracy of the insulator discharge process and flashover voltage prediction, especially for the complex pollution area. During the generation and propagation of the arc, the leakage current under SDDm is relatively higher and the pollution layer resistance is lower compared to that under SDDe; the variations in the pollution layer resistance and leakage current with arc development under SDDm do not adequately reflect the actual conditions.